MPU-6050 vs LSM6D* — IMU Comparison

Two of the most common gyroscope/IMU sensors you’ll encounter in DIY projects, robotics, and wearables are the MPU-6050 from InvenSense and the LSM6D* family (e.g. LSM6DS3, LSM6DSM, LSM6DSOX) from STMicroelectronics. Both provide 6-axis sensing (accelerometer + gyroscope), but they differ a lot in performance, power consumption, and features.

Main Specifications

Comparison of MPU-6050 and LSM6D*
Feature MPU-6050 LSM6D*
Type 6-axis IMU (Accel + Gyro) 6-axis IMU (Accel + Gyro)
Gyroscope range ±250 … ±2000 dps ±125 … ±2000 dps
Accelerometer range ±2/±4/±8/±16 g ±2/±4/±8/±16 g
ODR (sampling rate) ~1 kHz 1.6–6.7 kHz (depending on model)
Noise Higher (older generation) Lower, more stable
Interfaces I²C (SPI only in MPU-6000) I²C & SPI
FIFO ~1 KB Larger FIFO + timestamps
Extra features Basic Pedometer, tap/free-fall, ML core
Supply voltage 2.4–3.46 V 1.71–3.6 V
Power consumption Higher Ultra-low-power modes
Package size Larger legacy package Smaller (2.5 × 3.0 mm)
Cost Very cheap, lots of clones More expensive, stable quality

Discussion

MPU-6050 is a classic chip and still extremely popular in the maker community. Its strengths are price, huge availability, and a ton of existing Arduino libraries. Downsides: relatively high noise, higher power draw, and no SPI interface in the 6050 version.

LSM6D* is a modern IMU line from ST. It offers lower noise, wider ODR range, works at lower voltages, has ultra-low-power modes, and comes with built-in functions like step detection, tap recognition, and even a small machine learning core in some variants.

Best Use Cases